Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Horizontal grid points within the analysis regions of 13 snapshots (in total 286,836 grid points) are categorized by the sign of either (a) ζ TP, (b) ∂ w/∂ z, or (c) ∂2 w/∂ z2.
Similar(59)
Three main points were categorized for detecting deceptive cases.
The data points were categorized into three random sets: 70% assigned for the model development, 15% for validation and the remaining 15% for verification of the model applicability.
Two hundred and sixty-five time points were categorized into three groups (SIRS, sepsis and SS).
The modified questions with scores of 4-5 points were categorized as appropriate content.
A patient with a summed score between 0 and 2 points was categorized as non-frail (NF) while a patient with a score of ≥3 points was categorized as frail (F).
Water points were categorized using several definitions, but for the purposes of the constrained randomization, we considered only those that were fully functional, perennial, protected, and had unrestricted public access (defined as "optimal water source").
The responses to the first question, asking about take-away points, were categorized based on similar responses; specific answers about discrete principles or topics were classified as physiology concepts (e.g., Frank-Starling curve), whereas general ideas or problem-solving approaches were classified as themes (e.g., learning to integrate physiology across organ systems).
Respondents scored one point for each item and were classified as having one, two, three and four or more unhealthy behaviors, whereas zero point was categorized as 'none'none
The four grades for each item were categorized as: One point (little or no time with depression symptoms); two points (part of time with the depression symptoms); three points (most time with depression symptoms); four points (almost all of the time with depression symptoms).
Each item is categorized into a five point Likert scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com