Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(58)
What is the point of rule-consequentialism with its infinitely amended rules if we can get the same practical result much more efficiently with the simpler act-consequentialism? Rule-consequentialists in fact have an excellent reply to the objection that their theory collapses into practical equivalence with act-consequentialism.
The point-of-obligation rule was a relatively obscure agenda item, a top priority for almost nobody but Icahn.
But Ahern has also drawn strength from at least three other things: his personal popularity; the Irish public's reluctance to delve too deeply into private matters; and a broader national attitude that tends to be not overly concerned with the finer points of rules, regulations and financial transparency.
The point of this rule is to prevent high-tech equipment getting into the wrong hands but it has been used for commercial advantage.
The point of the rule is to prohibit products like Marlboro clothing that provide marketing messages through means other than advertising.
There appears to be little doubt Neil's hit violated the fundamental point of this rule: "A hit resulting in contact with an opponent's head where the head is targeted and the principal point of contact is not permitted".
This may or may not be relevant to the question of patriotism, depending on just what we take the point of princely rule to be.
Wikipedia's 900 volunteer administrators enforce a "neutral point of view" rule and encourage users to delete copy displaying clear bias.
Well, darn right -- yes: The whole point of the rule is to protect students and taxpayers by giving career colleges incentives to lower their prices, raise their quality and improve their job placement efforts.
Contributions that did not conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view rule, for instance, were either deleted within minutes by the community or changed in a way to make them conform.
Indeed, the whole point of formulating rule-consequentialism this way is to make room for rules about how to respond negatively to such people.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com