Sentence examples for plural identities from inspiring English sources

The robbing of our plural identities not only reduces us; it impoverishes the world.

Progressive integration, so understood, is not assimilation into a "melting pot" that requires the loss of all plural identities, not least because such demands can themselves form barriers to integration and offend against liberal ideas of autonomy.

The head of the Equality and Human Rights Commission offered an incisive critique of Powell's central points - that racial integration was impossible; that numbers were the crucial issue; that plural identities are impossible.

What has really been happening in France, Robb argues, is the erosion of centralised political control in Paris as the plural identities of France - linguistic, cultural and even religious - re-emerge from the margins.

This is because it is not the 'Great Nation' it often thinks it is, but a mutating series of plural identities that are occasionally in harmony but all too often in collision.

It deserves a very wide readership". "This book is a genuine page-turner and a scrupulously researched microhistory, a finely-stitched tapestry that captures well the loosely construed unity, diversity, and plural identities of Russia's borderlands of empire...

If we adopt a language that allows the formation of plural terms we can unproblematically define a plural identity relation that holds between pluralities of objects too.

Plural identity statements such as "the hunters are identical with the gatherers" are understood to mean that for all x, x is one of the hunters iff x is one of the gatherers.

It is by definition a plural identity; it is multi-ethnic and that has offered a capaciousness for mass immigration in the 20th century.

Writing at a time when that plural identity is under attack from the Hindu right, who sometimes appear to want to turn India into a Hindu version of Pakistan, Khilnani does not pull his punches and marshals the lessons of history to make an important political point about India's infinite variety, and its "capacity to change itself, and to challenge its own dogmas".

What does it say about a nation's capacity to sustain its plural identity when its liberal voices accept – even welcome – the entrenchment of a dictum which, ignoring every principle of natural justice, punishes the injured minority to placate the majority?