Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Plural birth events were 1.6-fold more likely to be classified as neonatal rather than fetal deaths.
The findings from the three earlier blocks were not made redundant by the medical adjusting variables of cesarean section, primiparity, plural birth, preterm birth, and maternal smoking.
Missing data among these mothers was distributed as follows: maternal age, 3; breast milk and solids, 3508; plural birth, 240; preterm birth, 33; daily smoking, 2045.
These included maternal race/ethnicity, birth weight, gestational age, method of delivery, maternal history of medical or predisposing conditions, presence of any congenital anomaly, number of prenatal care visits, maternal age, maternal education, plural birth, birth hospital, and maternal county of residence (data not shown in table).
Similar(56)
A reasonably accurate rule for determing the incidence of plural births among human beings is Hellin's Law, named after the Frenchman who propounded it, in 1895.
A reasonably accurate rule for determing the incidence of plural births among human beings is Hellin's Law, named after the… Talk story about General Foods new recipe booklet "Cake Making at High Altitudes," & interview with Mrs E. C. Blair manager of the Genl.
The results were adjusted for cesarean sections, primiparity, plural births, preterm births, and maternal smoking.
For plural births, the first birth record was used for the analysis.
Moreover, in the case of plural births, we included only one of the twins to avoid dependence between observations.
The variables included in the data analysis were primiparity, plural births, cesarean sections, and gestational age (based on ultrasound examination) from the MBRN.
In the forth block, we introduced adjusting variables related to events happening from parturition to six months postpartum (i.e. cesarean sections, primiparity, plural births, preterm births, and daily smoking).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com