plastered with muck

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "plastered with muck" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is covered or coated with dirt, grime, or a similar substance, often in a messy or excessive way. Example: "After the heavy rain, the car was plastered with muck from the muddy roads."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

His face plastered with drool and sand.

The New Yorker

All are plastered with legal disclaimers.

The Economist

The doors were plastered with handwritten messages.

Independent

Cigarette packets are plastered with health warnings.

The Economist

Plastered with posters saying: "All stock reduced.

The Guardian - Business

Hospitals here are plastered with antibribery posters.

The New York Times

A wall was plastered with past covers.

The New Yorker

Storefronts and subway stations were plastered with signs.

The New York Times

It is plastered with the business cards of customers.

The New York Times

Asunción is plastered with posters trumpeting the country's sovereignty.

The Economist

When the tip is plastered with antibodies, this cannot happen.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "plastered with muck" to vividly describe a surface that is heavily and messily covered in dirt or a similar unpleasant substance. This phrase is stronger than simply saying "dirty" or "muddy."

Common error

Avoid using "plastered with muck" in formal or professional writing. While grammatically correct, it can sound too informal or even vulgar for such settings. Opt for more neutral alternatives like "covered in dirt" or "coated with grime".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "plastered with muck" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase, modifying a noun to indicate its state of being covered in a dirty or unpleasant substance. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in English, even if uncommon.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "plastered with muck" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe something heavily covered in dirt or grime. As Ludwig AI indicates, while usable, the phrase is uncommon and tends toward informal contexts. It’s best used to add vividness to descriptions, but should be avoided in formal writing where more neutral alternatives are preferable. Related phrases include "covered in grime" and "coated in dirt", offering similar meanings with varying degrees of intensity. Due to its stronger, slightly vulgar tone, consider your audience and the context before employing this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

covered in grime

Focuses on a layer of dirt or filth covering a surface.

coated in dirt

Emphasizes a layer of earth or soil covering something.

smeared with mud

Suggests a wet, sloppy application of mud.

caked in filth

Highlights a thick, hardened layer of dirt and unpleasant matter.

encrusted with dirt

Implies a hard, crusty layer of accumulated dirt.

layered with sludge

Describes a coating of thick, slimy mud.

daubed with mire

Suggests a messy application of thick, heavy mud.

smothered in mire

Emphasizes a complete covering by thick mud.

bedecked with grime

More figurative, suggests a decorative but unwanted covering of dirt.

awash in filth

Figurative, suggests being overwhelmed by dirt and grime.

FAQs

How can I use "plastered with muck" in a sentence?

You can use "plastered with muck" to vividly describe something covered in dirt or grime. For example, "After the off-road race, the vehicles were "covered in muck"."

What are some alternatives to "plastered with muck"?

Alternatives include "coated in dirt", "covered in grime", or "smeared with mud", depending on the specific type of dirt or unpleasant substance.

Is it appropriate to use "plastered with muck" in formal writing?

Generally, no. "Plastered with muck" is fairly informal. In formal writing, consider using phrases like "covered in soil" or "coated with grime" instead.

What's the difference between "plastered with muck" and "covered in dirt"?

"Plastered with muck" implies a heavier, messier covering than "covered in dirt". "Plastered" suggests a thick, almost overwhelming layer, while "covered" is more general. You might say something is "lightly covered in dirt" but it would sound strange to say that something is lightly "plastered with muck".