Sentence examples for planning claimed from inspiring English sources

Last week, Richard Mrowicki, head of strategy and business planning, claimed that building new nuclear plants on the sites of existing ones would reduce decommissioning costs because the sites of ageing reactors will not have to be returned to greenfield status.

Luigi Piccinato, one of the founding fathers of Italian urban planning, claimed that it was possible to define a typology of cities – radial, grid, port-cities, etc.- to which corresponded a repertory of possible plans; Giovanni Astengo promoted a scientific approach to land use planning in a direct dialogue with the Athen's Charter of the Modern Movement.

Last year, Miguel Angel Fernandez – the local councillor in charge of urban planning – claimed that the area had been designated for multi-purpose use, but as is tradition in Andalusian politics, nothing has been done to explain to the community what that will mean for their future.

Councillor Monika Juneja, who is Guildford's councillor in charge of planning, claims she is being politically and racially targeted.

Critics of the plan claimed that figure should have been raised to cover the entire cost of a new boiler.

The Polish president, Lech Kaczynski, a strong supporter of the plan, claimed that Mr Obama had told him that missile defences would go ahead.

Some critics of the St. Barnabas plan claimed it created an incentive for the hospital to try to curtail care so it could increase its profits.

However, the plan closed areas of work by reviewing all functions within the School of Medicine after the plan claimed to "investigate new ways of working" and "embrace positive change that delivers real impact".

Campaigners against the plans claimed the "car-centric development" would have a detrimental impact on local businesses on nearby Gloucester Road, air quality and traffic congestion.

Proponents of the Miller-Durbin plan claimed the proposal is the best offer for students under serious consideration in Washington.

In one instance, the site responded to a 2006 open letter opposing the Canadian Government's climate-change plans, claimed to be signed by "accredited experts in climate and related scientific disciplines", by analyzing the list of the signatories.