Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
To improve the vertical plane response of an AUV, Hsu et al. [11] modified a switching integral control loop based on vertical plane modeling, which improves the transient response and eliminates steady-state depth errors.
The axial 50 50 plane response for the SM signal is 3.4 ± 0.1 μm comparatively to 1.3 μm for a SM fiber based confocal microscope with a filling factor A of 1.2 [ 18].
In a spectrally encoded confocal microscopy setup at 1310 nm with a water immersion objective (NA = 1), the MM 50 50 axial plane response of 5.8 ± 0.1 μm is 1.5 time larger than the SM 50 50 axial plane response, the intensity collected comparatively to the SM signal is increased by a factor 5.5 and the MM signal speckle contrast is 3 times lower than the SM signal speckle contrast.
The axial 50 50 plane response for the MM signal is 5.8 ± 0.1 μm comparatively to 4 μm for a partially coherent SM confocal microscope with a filling factor A of 1.2 and a d/MFD ratio of 5.5 (see Fig. 1(b)).
Following Gu's work [ 15], we define the axial plane response of the system as (3) I (u ) ∝ ∫ 0 ν p | ∫ 0 1 P 1 P 2 exp (i u ρ 2 ) J 0 ρ d ρ | 2 ν d ν, where I u) is the collected intensity as a function of defocus for different values of ν p, the normalized radius of the DCF inner cladding at the plane of the fiber.
Similar(55)
At larger amplitudes the in-plane response becomes unstable and a coupled whirling superharmonic component occurs.
The dynamic out-of-plane response of unreinforced masonry walls is investigated.
Lateral in-plane response plays crucial role in seismic behavior of masonry structures.
In the current study, applicability of the same procedure to the estimation of maximum in-plane response is discussed.
Out-of-plane response of cold-formed steel beams, including lateral-torsional buckling, remains as needed future work.
A finite element model of the box is constructed from membrane elements which accommodate only in-plane response.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com