Sentence examples for plaintiffs assertion from inspiring English sources

Ms. Alvarez said Thursday that she agreed with the plaintiffs' assertion that the Illinois Constitution upholds marriage equality for same-sex couples.

The judge also said he would hear further argument on the plaintiffs' assertion that the law's vast expansion of Medicaid, a shared state and federal program, amounts to an unconstitutional commandeering of state tax dollars.

The court rejected the plaintiffs' assertion that the analysis of climate change impacts had been inadequate and arbitrary, finding that FWS had reasonably concluded that the species would likely survive and adapt to a warming climate.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing for the majority in the 6-to-3 decision, said the plaintiffs' assertion was enough for purposes of class certification because the question at that stage was merely whether, in the words of the relevant rule of civil procedure, "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members".

The court deferred, however, to BLM's assessment of cumulative greenhouse gas impacts, rejecting the plaintiffs' assertion that BLM should have been required to use a metric such as a "global carbon budget" or "social cost of carbon protocol" as the standard for measuring cumulative climate impacts.

In rejecting the discrimination claims of black passengers against an airline based on an international treaty limiting suits against carriers, she rejected the plaintiffs' assertion that "we should nonetheless carve out an exception for civil rights actions as a matter of policy" in light of "the specter that our decision will open the doors to blatant discrimination aboard international flights".

Konrad S. Alt, Providian's chief public policy officer, said yesterday that the company was not acknowledging the truth or falsehood of any of the plaintiffs' assertions.

But Shigeru Nakanishi, the presiding judge of the Tokyo District Court, rejected the plaintiffs' assertions, saying the board acted within constitutional boundaries.

The dissent by Judge A. Raymond Randolph — that the majority had too quickly accepted the plaintiffs' assertions and rejected evidence that retooling or replacing the approximately seven million food-and-beverage vending machines in the country could cost $3.5 billion if bills of different size were introduced — is specious.

The dissenter Tuesday was Judge A. Raymond Randolph, who said the majority had too quickly accepted the plaintiffs' assertions and rejected evidence that retooling or replacing the approximately seven million food-and-beverage vending machines in the country could cost $3.5 billion if bills of different size were introduced.

We find nothing to support plaintiff's assertion that defendant has further encroached on plaintiff's field since 1953; to be sure, defendant has trebled its business but not by moving away from its traditional area and into plaintiff's.