Sentence examples for place choices from inspiring English sources

Figure  7 depicts the mean percentages of feature and place choices of the three experimental groups.

In addition, we investigated whether sex had an influence on feature and place choices using Mann–Whitney U tests and whether age correlated with feature and place choices, respectively, using Spearman rank correlations.

In addition, we used one-sample Wilcoxon tests to determine whether on average subjects in each of the three groups made feature or place choices significantly above chance.

When we compared the percentage of feature and place choices in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we found evidence that the percentage of place choices increased significantly from Experiment 1 to Experiment 2. These results demonstrate that the different tasks in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 had some influence on which strategies were preferentially used by the apes.

When we compared the percentage of feature and place choices in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we found that subjects made significantly more place choices in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1 (Wilcoxon tests: feature: Z = 1.424, P = 0.164; place: Z = 2.521, P = 0.009).

In addition, we investigated whether there was a significant change in strategy preference from Experiment 1 to Experiment 2 by comparing the percentages of feature and place choices of Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 using Wilcoxon tests.

For the first time in school history, the Ivy League media panel selected Harvard as its first place choice.

We used live coding and coding from videotapes to score the following dependent variables: choices of the container under which the food could previously be found (feature choice), choices of the container in the place where the food could be found during training (place choice), or choices of the container in the middle of the platform (middle choice) (see Fig.  4b).

We used live coding and coding from videotapes to code the following dependent variables: choice of the container under which the food could previously be found (feature choice); choice of the container in the place where the food could be found during training (place choice); choice of the container in the middle of the platform (middle choice) (see Fig.  4b).

The process repeats itself, dipping into third-place choices, if necessary, until someone has a majority.

The second-place choices of Mr. Gingrich's supporters are about evenly divided between several different candidates, which means that they might each have an incentive to go after him.