Sentence examples for pitch degrees from inspiring English sources

The ideas are illustrated in an application involving a tension leg platform with closely spaced frequencies for the heave and pitch degrees of freedom.

It has been found that the proposed methodology offers results which agree well with the experimental data and the accuracy of the estimated flutter derivatives is similar to the results reported in the literature where the complete set of numerical simulations has been performed for both heave and pitch degrees of freedom.

A three degree-of-freedom model with vertical, fore-and-aft and rotational (i.e. pitch) degrees of freedom has been developed with twelve model parameters (representing inertia, stiffness, damping, and geometry) optimised to the measured vertical apparent mass and the measured fore-and-aft cross-axis apparent mass of the body.

The content of each column is: Timestamp (seconds), Boolean of system activated (0 if < 50 km/h), Acceleration in X (Gs), Acceleration in Y (Gs), Acceleration in Z (Gs), Acceleration in X filtered by KF (Gs), Acceleration in Y filtered by KF (Gs), Acceleration in Z filtered by KF (Gs), Roll (degrees), Pitch (degrees), Yaw (degrees).  .

Structural stiffness and damping in pitch degree of freedom were represented by nonlinear polynomials.

We consider an aeroelastic model simulating a two degree-of-freedom airfoil oscillating in pitch and plunge with a freeplay nonlinearity in the pitch degree-of-freedom.

A cubic nonlinearity in pitch degree is adopted to prevent the aeroelastic responses from divergence when the flow velocity exceeds the critical flutter speed.

This system consists of a plunging and pitching rigid airfoil supported by a linear spring in the plunge degree of freedom and a nonlinear spring which includes the simulated stoppers at high angles in the pitch degree of freedom.

In this research study, we investigate the effects of discontinuous nonlinear stiffness simulating regions of freeplay, linear stiffness, and stoppers in the pitch degree of freedom on the response of a two-degree of freedom aeroelastic system.

To demonstrate the accuracy of the method for industrial applications, the complete aerodynamic derivatives for lateral, vertical and pitching degrees-of-freedom are computed for two bridge deck sectional models and compared with experimental wind-tunnel results.

In order to understand the dynamic behaviors of these "hot" structures, a double-wedge lifting surface with combining freeplay and cubic structural nonlinearities in both plunging and pitching degrees-of-freedom operating in supersonic/hypersonic flight speed regimes has been analyzed.