Cronbach's α for the pilot study data was 0.80 (n = 20), indicating satisfactory internal consistency.
After the pilot study, data was collected with a researcher developed tool.
The issue with Reaction was the theorisation of the category itself, making it hard for the coding of the pilot study data from the outset.
However, Fear does not only have irrealis triggers but also has realis triggers as many instances in the pilot study data demonstrated.
The research around toddler Luci's wider relationships with her community and family members offered an additional perspective to pilot study data of her participation videoed in LDC.
When used to measure fidelity during the LTG pilot study, data from the Session Logging Tool was triangulated with facilitator interviews and direct observations of PD workshops.
In the pilot study data, 'good' was found to realise both Reaction-Impact and Reaction-Quality as in instances (9) and (10).
However, the feeling of Surprise can be related to both positive and negative feelings as found in the pilot study data.
Conclusions: Reflection on the pilot study data and experience by participants, treating practitioners and researchers led to modifications in the design and a sample size calculation.
Firstly, as indicated in the pilot study data, the findings of the main study confirmed that the proposed distinction between Impact and Quality as presented in part 1 was valid.
Our pilot study data demonstrated that zoonotic disease transmission could occur through a number of ways, such as directly from contact with livestock or manure or from contaminated food, milk, or water.
