Exact(1)
Furthermore, a recent study [ 5] at the Advanced Biofuels Process Demonstration Unit (ABPDU) has demonstrated the successful scale-up of IL-based pretreatment from lab scale to small pilot scale without any operational difficulties or loss in performance.
Similar(59)
Another possible explanation for the lower yield is that in this study the lime pretreatment was carried out on a pilot scale and without continuous temperature control, thereby leading to lower cellulose digestibility compared with a bench-scale test.
The developed model is validated with pilot scale experiments carried out without reaction.
A series of 9 trials were conducted in 550-l pilot scale fermenters: 2 fermentations without foam control agent (FCA) addition, 4 controls with FCA addition on demand, and three with the cone as the sole method of level control.
A pilot scale column, operated at low bed heights without the addition of mechanical shear, produced results that compared well with 1-D model predictions.
The pilot scale plants summarized in Table 3 operate without 'on-site' production of (hemi-) cellulolytic enzymes.
Three different pretreatment methods were used: steam pretreatment (with and without soaking in dilute H2SO4) in pilot scale at Inbicon A/S (Skærbæk, Denmark) [ 23]; steam explosion of SO2-impregnated biomass in pilot scale at SEKAB E-technology (Örnsköldsvik, Sweden) [ 57]; and organosolv pretreatment in laboratory scale at University of British Columbia (Vancouver, Canada) [ 58].
In a pilot scale wall-cooled tubular reactor, temperature profiles have been measured with and without reaction.
A pilot scale 100 150 L/h plate heat exchanger (PHE) was retrofitted with ultrasound transducers without changing the main PHE design.
Bench scale experiments were conducted using a 5-L bubble column filled with 10% v/v hydroalcoholic solution, and the pilot scale experiments were performed using a 95-L column filled with industrial fermented wine without yeast.
experiments were carried out in a pilot scale upflow reactor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com