Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

pig for more

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "pig for more" is not correct and does not make sense in written English.
It appears to be a miscommunication or a typo, as it lacks clear meaning or context. Example: "I don't understand what you mean by 'pig for more.' Could you clarify your statement?"

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

"I remember Schmeichel screaming like a pig for more protection when we played Wimbledon when he first came here.

The restaurant was run by the same owners of Botín, the oldest restaurant in Madrid, famous for its cochinillo, roasted suckling pig, for more than 300 years.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The new strain was initially described as triple reassortants of viruses from pigs, humans, and birds, called triple-reassortant swine influenza A (H1) viruses, which have circulated in pigs for more than a decade [20].

Science

Plosone

For the farmers, 17% (n = 20) had been working with pigs for less than four years, while 83% (n = 99) had been working with pigs for more than four years.

Once again, the authors concluded that positive titers were associated with either working with pigs or living on a pig farm for more than 10 years, and also found that study participants who worked with both finishing and nursery pigs had 8.8 times the odds of having a positive titer when compared to non-exposed participants.

The pig-adapted serotype S Derby, for example, has managed to survive in a pig herd for more than a decade, in spite of several eradication attempts [ 22].

Detailed data registered in 2004 by the VetStat programme on antimicrobial use in Denmark showed that prescriptions for weaner pigs accounted for more than one third of the total antimicrobial consumption in pigs and that gastrointestinal diseases were the most common indications for prescriptions in this age group [ 3].

Facilities housing > 55,000 pigs accounted for more than half of the total U.S. swine inventory, reflecting the increasing consolidation and concentration of U.S. swine production (USDA 2006a).

In commercial pig production, plant carbohydrates (CHO) represent the main fraction of a pig diet, accounting for more than 2/3rd of the dry matter (DM; Bach Knudsen, 1997) and the single most abundant feed energy in diets for piglets, growing pigs and sows comprising 60.0%to70.0%0% of total energy intake (Bach Knudsen et al., 2012).

Science

Animal

A swaying gait, recumbency, difficult breathing and flushing of the skin, particularly over the abdomen and extremities in white-skinned pigs, commonly develop in pigs that survive for more than a day.

Formal & Business

FAO

Mr. Travis rebranded his practice as Sentient Architecture (sentientarchitecture.com) and persuaded 10 of his clients to agree to be guinea pigs for a more elaborate questionnaire — which became the Truehome workshop — for a 20percentt reduction in design fees, he said.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "pig for more" as it's grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear meaning. Instead, consider using alternatives like "ask for more" or "request more" depending on the context.

Common error

Do not assume that "pig for more" is a standard or widely understood phrase. Using it in writing may lead to confusion and miscommunication. Always opt for clearer and more conventional expressions.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "pig for more" does not have a clearly defined grammatical function due to its lack of standard usage and grammatical correctness. Ludwig AI indicates it as incorrect.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "pig for more" is grammatically incorrect and lacks a clear, established meaning in English. Ludwig AI identifies the phrase as not correct. Its occurrence in the provided examples appears to be either misinterpretations or typos. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid using this phrase in both formal and informal writing. Alternatives like "ask for more" or "request more" are recommended for conveying the intended meaning clearly and correctly.

FAQs

What does "pig for more" mean?

The phrase "pig for more" is grammatically incorrect and lacks a standard meaning in English. It's likely a misinterpretation or typo.

What can I say instead of "pig for more"?

You can use alternatives like "ask for more", "request more", or "want more" depending on the context.

Is "pig for more" grammatically correct?

No, "pig for more" is not grammatically correct. It does not follow standard English grammar rules.

How can I use "ask for more" in a sentence?

You can use "ask for more" in sentences like "If you need clarification, don't hesitate to ask for more details" or "The team will ask for more resources to complete the project successfully".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

1.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: