The phrase "piece of judicial" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to refer to a specific aspect or element of the judicial system or a particular legal decision. Example: The lawyer's argument focused on a crucial piece of judicial evidence that had been overlooked by the prosecution.
Judge Read called the majority's decision "a remarkable piece of judicial legerdemain, shot through with after-the fact analysis".
In May, in a notable piece of judicial interventionism, the Constitutional Court put more teeth into the law: it knocked down a provision that gave prosecutors only 60 days to investigate the paramilitaries' crimes, and required that their assets, even if legally obtained, should be used to compensate victims.
Michael Hor has described the judiciary's reluctance to address these points as "an elegant piece of judicial 'kung fu'" in which it chose to evade the problem.
He described the special court as an "expensive and divisive piece of judicial machinery" which served little purpose following the deaths of most of the prominent defendants, and believed that its continuation "could undermine the fragile peace" in Sierra Leone.
He understood why people wanted "to have some kind of policy format across the piece"; he reported that "we can look across the piece in terms of where these tribunals actually sit" and that "we now have the ability to look across the piece in terms of judicial careers"; and he reassured the committee members that "we are now looking at courts and tribunals across the piece".
citizens was during the EU Privacy Shield negotiations, and whether another relevant piece of U.S. legislation (the Judicial Redress Act) is also affected by Trump's executive order.
To this extent, it is important that Floridians remind the nation next week that the parameters set by scores of judicial interpretations and pieces of federal legislation regarding the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment are not only viable, but best for this nation's future.
Epps' piece is, in essence, an anticipatory charge of judicial activism.
Banning him from making any films for 20 years is far more than a piece of banality in the Iranian judicial system.
Yet I had seen him writing a piece that implied fairly bitter opposition to the process of judicial killing.
Gave New York 50 years of Judicial service.
