Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(17)
Pictures were analysed in a blind test using the Pannoramic Viewer 1.15.4 software (3DHistech).
42 clinical pictures were analysed.
The images were captured using a digital camera, and all the DGGE gel pictures were analysed using the Phoretix 1D analysis software.
Digital pictures were analysed using the Adobe Photoshop pixel measuring tool.
Pictures were analysed using a Canon camera (Krefeld, Germany).
Phase-contrast pictures were analysed by AxioVision 4.0 software (Zeiss, Le Pecq, France).
Similar(43)
Five micrographs per slide were taken and two cells per picture were analysed.
Only texts were analysed; pictures, videos or animations were disregarded.
In total, 91 pictures of males from all sites were analysed (Table 1).
Membranes were converted to numerical pictures by scanning, and band intensities were analysed using the ImageJ 1.33a software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
However, when only genes that had no contigs incorrectly assigned to them were analysed a different picture emerged.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com