Sentence examples for physics of objects from inspiring English sources

And some of his successors, like Dr. Rees and a colleague at Cambridge, Stephen Hawking, have spent their careers studying the implications for physics of objects that can wrap spacetime around themselves like a magician's cloak and disappear.

Performing Cirque which he did numerous times around Europe and in New York allowed him to work out the complicated physics of objects in motion and directly informed his breakthrough creation of the mobile perfectly balanced devices that, as they slice through space, model three-dimensional forms.

Who could be sure how products so small that they would be invisible to the human eye would behave, particularly when the nanoworld's basic design elements -- atoms and small molecules -- are governed by the surreal laws of quantum mechanics rather than the more familiar Newtonian physics of large objects?

Many learning studies on the physics of sinking objects have incorporated hands-on experiences as part of their didactic choices (e.g., Kloos & Somerville, 2001).

While theoretical models helped us to understand the basic physics of these objects, numerical simulations have been allowing us to go beyond the one-dimensional, steady-state approach extracting vital information.

The physics of falling objects has a logic that is bound by rules.

If you're dealing with complicated formulae and figuring out the physics of falling objects, you've got better things to do than get distracted by your awkward pocket square and how your pencil skirt seems to be choking your knees.

The finding, presented at the Royal Astronomical Society National Astronomy Meeting here, may ultimately help astronomers better understand the physics of these exotic objects.

This is distinct from information visualization, which focuses on methods such as heat maps for showing high-dimensional research results, and scientific visualization, which focuses on the mathematics and physics of visualizing complex objects.

It entails that everything that the laws of physics require physical objects to do can, in principle, be emulated in arbitrarily fine detail by some program on a general-purpose computer, provided it is given enough time and memory.

From this perspective, both the individuality and non-individuality packages get off on the wrong feet, as it were, by assuming that the way the world is, according to physics, is a world of objects, which can either be regarded as individuals, whether primitively or via weak discernibility, or as non-individuals, whether formally represented through quasi-set theory or not.