Sentence examples for phonological complexity from inspiring English sources

The Index of Phonological Complexity and the Word Complexity Measure are two measures of the phonological complexity of a word.

There are three key components hypothesised to drive the relationship between phonological tasks and reading; (a) the linguistic nature of the stimuli, (b) the phonological complexity of the stimuli, and (c) the production of a verbal response.

A structural equation model, where tasks were grouped according to stimulus, revealed that the linguistic nature and the phonological complexity of the stimulus predicted unique variance in decoding, over and above matched comparison tasks without these components.

It also implicitly incorporates phoneme inventory and phonological complexity information.

Therefore, any differences between regular and irregular forms in our experiment cannot be due to differences in phonological complexity.

As noted above and depicted in Table 1, hard-to-name pictures differed relatively subtly across several dimensions from easy-to-name ones, including the frequency of word occurrence, phonological complexity, and visual object complexity.

For all sentences, the affected object was a familiar noun of one or two syllables, and the proper names used were controlled for phonological and syllabic complexity: vowels (V) and consonants (C) in either V-C-V or C-V-C-V patterns.

These results were expected, since the development of phonological awareness involves hierarchical patterns of complexity and syllable awareness is more easily acquired than phonemic awareness [ 50].

Although there is a lot of controversy in the field, Rosen (2003) suggested in a review of the literature that, rather than a general auditory deficit, the deficit underlying RD is most likely linguistic and phonological in nature and that acoustic complexity should be taken into account (but see Richardson et al., 2004 for a recent account of a nonspeech-specific mechanism).

Errors are classified into four types: phonological, simple grammatical spelling, complex grammatical spelling, and irregular phonological relation.

There was a significant interaction between morphological complexity and task type for phonological shift versus stable words, F (1, 51) = 75.36, p <.001.