Sentence examples for phonetic identity from inspiring English sources

Absolute phonetic identity is a theoretical ideal never fully realized.

What is at issue is the difference between phonetic and phonological (or phonemic) identity, and for these purposes it will be sufficient to define phonetic identity in terms solely of acoustic "sameness".

The phonetic identity between a Dravidian term for 'paddy': Tamil vari 'paddy', Telugu vari 'paddy' (Burrow 1984), on the one hand, and the Austronesian languages Malagasy vary 'rice' and Nadju Dayak (Borneo) bari 'cooked rice' is noteworthy.

In these cases, also the phonetic clue provided by the consonant is the same (e.g. Do and Do sharp provide both the phonetic consonant cue /d/ with the vowel phoneme /o/), and this total phonetic identity could create a trouble also for AP-musicians.

Methods involve the generation of synthetic syllables in which all acoustic elements (known in aggregate as the base) are held constant across a series of stimuli at settings providing ambiguous information about phonetic identity, with one exception.

Coherence masking protection (CMP) was used, which involves labeling a phonetically relevant formant (the target) presented in noise, either alone or in combination with a stable spectral band (the cosignal) that provides no additional information about phonetic identity and is well outside the critical band of the target.

Phonological identity, unlike phonetic similarity, is absolute: two phonemes are either the same or different, they cannot be more or less similar.

First, an acoustic space representing two effective factors, namely phonetic context and speaker identity, is modeled.

➢ Phonetic-level features Phoneme identity before the preceding phoneme; preceding, current, and succeeding phonemes; and phoneme identity after the next phoneme Position of the current phoneme in the current syllable, word, phrase, and sentence.

They satisfy the criterion of phonetic similarity, but this, though a necessary condition of phonemic identity, is not a sufficient one.

The activation differences in the identity condition may just reflect higher efforts at the level of phonetic analysis.