Suggestions(1)
Exact(8)
Findings might be limited by selection bias as pharmacies were selected on a convenience basis.
Six pharmacies were selected as the closest within a 0.5 mile radius of the lead author's home address using Google Maps.
A country survey was conducted and facilities representing both public and private pharmacies were selected.
The pharmacies were selected without considering their size, the number of people working in them, or the gender of the supervisor/proprietor.
Three pharmacies were selected from each of the 18 wards once the resource and time constraints on the part of the data collection teams had been taken into consideration, making a total of 54 pharmacies.
However the pharmacies were selected to include a range of types and locations across the Nottingham area and data collection was spread over five months in an attempt to minimise these effects.
Similar(52)
A random sample of 300 pharmacies was selected using a random numbers generator, 30 and then further randomised into three groups of 100 pharmacies.
A sample of 877 private pharmacies was selected (using a stratified, systematic sampling with random start), among which 847 were successfully visited.
For both group B and C, ten general practices and collaborating pharmacies are selected from the above-mentioned networks as well.
No more than one of each chain pharmacy was selected.
Permission was sought from the Company's Head Office and a pharmacy was selected based upon the pharmacy conducting a reasonable number of MURs to ensure recruitment to the study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com