petitioner have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "petitioner have" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "petitioner has" to agree with the singular subject "petitioner." Example: "The petitioner has submitted all required documents for the case."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The state law should be changed to require that the petitioner have adequate income to pay for his/her attorney as well as the salary of the guardian ad litem to prevent mismanagement of patients with cognitive disorders.

Clinical interventions in aging

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Petitioner has already demonstrated the fallacy of that contention.

The New York Times

At least one such petitioner has even set himself on fire.

The Economist

Each petitioner had three minutes to say his or her piece.

The New York Times - Magazine

Under these standards, no pardon can be recommended unless a petitioner has been out of prison and law-abiding for at least five years.

The New York Times

Last July, the agency said it would no longer enforce the two-year filing rule when a petitioner has applied for what is known as equitable relief.

The New York Times

(In 2003, a state appeals court panel stated that a petitioner "had no burden to show that he is safe to own or possess guns").

The New York Times

The statute is similarly vague, requiring only that a judge find that the petitioner has "led a law-abiding life since discharge or release, and appears likely to do so".

The New York Times

For example, in NAACP v. Alabama, it was argued that we were without jurisdiction because the petitioner had not pursued the correct appellate remedy in Alabama' s state courts.

The New York Times

It said: "The issuance of the stay suggests that a majority of the court, while not deciding the issues presented, believe that the petitioner has a substantial probability of success".

The New York Times

It suffices to say that the issuance of the stay suggests that a majority of the court, while not deciding the issues presented, believe that the petitioner has a substantial probability of success.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always ensure subject-verb agreement. With singular nouns like "petitioner", use the singular form of the verb, which is "has".

Common error

Avoid using the plural verb form "have" with the singular noun "petitioner". Remember that singular subjects require singular verbs.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "petitioner have" is an example of incorrect subject-verb agreement. The word "petitioner" is singular and, therefore, requires the singular verb form "has". Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase violates standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "petitioner have" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "petitioner has" due to subject-verb agreement. While the term "petitioner" is often found in legal and formal contexts, the grammatical error undermines the professionalism of the communication. As pointed out by Ludwig AI, this is not correct in standard written English. Therefore, always use "petitioner has" when referring to a single petitioner to maintain grammatical accuracy and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

petitioner has

Corrects the subject-verb agreement to singular.

the petitioner possesses

Replaces "have" with a synonym, ensuring grammatical correctness.

the petitioner holds

Uses "holds" as a substitute, maintaining a similar meaning and correct grammar.

the petitioner is in possession of

Employs a longer, more formal phrasing to convey possession.

the applicant has

Replaces "petitioner" with "applicant" and maintains correct subject-verb agreement.

the appellant has

Substitutes "petitioner" with "appellant" while keeping the grammar correct.

the claimant has

Replaces "petitioner" with the synonymous "claimant", ensuring proper grammar.

the petitioner is required to have

Introduces a requirement aspect, implying possession indirectly.

the petitioner is known to have

Shifts the focus to what the petitioner is known for possessing.

petitioners have

Corrects the agreement to plural (more than one petitioner).

FAQs

How to correct the phrase "petitioner have"?

The correct phrase is "petitioner has" to ensure subject-verb agreement.

What is a grammatically correct alternative to "petitioner have"?

Alternatives include "the petitioner possesses" or "the petitioner holds", which maintain a similar meaning.

When should I use "petitioner has" instead of "petitioner have"?

Use "petitioner has" when referring to a single petitioner. "Petitioners have" is correct when referring to multiple petitioners.

What's the difference between "petitioner has" and "petitioners have"?

"Petitioner has" refers to a single person making a petition, while "petitioners have" refers to multiple people making a petition. Ensure the verb agrees with the subject's number.