This economic evaluation confirms this equivalence by finding no differences in costs (from either of two perspectives), quality-adjusted life years or cost-effectiveness.
Cabero (2006a) proposes that curricular content must be analyzed from a three-fold perspective – quality, quantity and structure – in order to ensure the content is pertinent, relevant and from a trustworthy source.
Variation among males in their forced-perspective quality as seen by their female audience indicates that visual perspective is available for use in mate choice, perhaps as an indicator of cognitive ability.
From the top-down perspective, quality work was described as something that infringes professional freedom.
In this perspective, quality work is characterized by coercive impositions, moreover often in forms that are inappropriate for primary care.
From the patient's perspective, quality of care is highly dependent on how providers mutually interact to provide high-quality services [ 16, 17].
From a psychometric perspective quality has been almost exclusively defined as the reliability of combinations of decisions and a "unified view of validity" [ 9- 13].
From this perspective, quality is at best only a proxy of healthcare performance, which is understood as a much broader concept.
From the adults' perspective, quality of life and health status are considered different constructs and this distinction has to be considered when selecting instruments to be used in quality of life research [ 37].
From a CQI philosophical perspective, quality is the product of a chain in which each person is a customer (client) of the people in the process preceding theirs (McLaughlin and Kaluzny 1994; Agyepong et al. 2001, 2004).
