Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
To perpetuate it publicly is to harm other persons, and this matters objectively even if I don't personally, subjectively care about the persons in question.
All I can tell you is, the persons in question were invited to the party, and that's the bottom line.
"The persons in question do not advocate the chosen solution, but respect the choice of the Ministry of Finance," according to a statement.
Also cool: when you label your buddies with Stipple's People Dots, you can opt to send notifications to the persons in question.
His principle for distinguishing those exempt from morally responsible agency is informed exclusively by whether the persons in question are incapacitated to understand and comply with the demands of moral obligations.
Arguably, even where a deontological framework has been adopted, the relevant deontic properties do not subsume, take the place of, provide the basis for, or go hand in hand with, the function-driven (or ends-directed) actions of the persons in question.
Similar(52)
Once this information is public, the person in question is open to all manner of personal threats, swatting, COD pizza delivery and so on.
For example, did the person in question become re-elected?
In one case, the person in question didn't even knock.
We say that the person in question is good or bad.
To start, he says it's important to understand how the person in question normally acts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com