personnel strength

USAGE SUMMARY

"personnel strength" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use the phrase to refer to the number of people in an organization, such as, "The company increased its personnel strength by 20% this quarter."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

--Information on perstrengthtrength, budget, weapons, training, force readiness, targeting, tactics, transportation, and logistics of the Palestinian Authority security forces.

The Guardian

The U.N. Security Council authorized a military personnel strength of 7,000, but only about 5,100 soldiers are in the country at present.

The New York Times

The Maliki government is implementing plans to expand the Iraqi Army and to increase its overall personnel strength to address critical gaps, but we judge that significant security gains from those programs will take at least 6 to 12 months, and probably longer, to materialize.

The New York Times

The RAN's personnel strength fell to 3,117 personnel, plus 131 members of the Naval Auxiliary Services.

Wikipedia

With total personnel strength of 11,000, this meant that 27% of the Louisiana National Guard was abroad.

Wikipedia

Total military personnel strength decreased by 19 percent, from about 2.2 million in 1989 to about 1.8 million in 1993.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Belcher noted that since Afghans "took the lead while still developing their capabilities in personnel administration, end strength numbers will fluctuate throughout the year".

Vice

The 24 staff members, in areas such as operations, player personnel, football analysis, strength and conditioning, athletic relations, and video, are in addition to the head coach, nine assistant coaches and four graduate assistant coaches.

Huffington Post

Supplements that have been suggested to enhance physical development of military personnel should improve strength and muscle size during training.

Amino Acids

Despite greater need, low- and middle-income countries tended to report less availability of skilled health personnel, although the strength of the supply-need relationship varied across geographical and economic country groupings.

BMC Health Services Research

By raising awareness of, and creating a shared perspective on, the threats and opportunities in their daily work processes, it enables personnel to recognise strengths and weaknesses [ 60].

BMC Health Services Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting on organizational changes, clearly state the "personnel strength" before and after the change to illustrate the impact.

Common error

Do not use "personnel strength" vaguely. Always specify the context and organization you are referring to, such as, "The company's "personnel strength" increased in the sales department."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "personnel strength" functions as a noun phrase, denoting the total number of individuals within an organization, particularly in contexts involving military or governmental bodies. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Wiki

33%

Science

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "personnel strength" is a grammatically sound and usable noun phrase that quantifies the number of individuals in an organization. Ludwig AI indicates that is acceptable to be used in written English. It's most frequently found in news, encyclopedic, and scientific contexts. While not as common as other similar phrases, it serves a clear purpose in providing precise data regarding workforce size and is best used with a specific context to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "staffing level" or "workforce size" can be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

authorized strength

Indicates the officially approved or mandated number of personnel.

total personnel

Directly states the total number of personnel without using "strength".

personnel count

Uses a more straightforward term, "count", to denote the number of personnel.

workforce size

Replaces "personnel" with "workforce" and uses "size" instead of "strength", focusing on the number of workers.

staffing level

Substitutes "personnel" with "staffing" and "strength" with "level", emphasizing the adequacy of staff.

number of employees

Replaces "personnel strength" with a more direct expression indicating the total count of employees.

manpower level

Uses "manpower" to refer to personnel and "level" to indicate the extent or amount.

employee headcount

Emphasizes counting individual employees, using the term "headcount".

staff complement

Refers to the full number or quantity of employees required or expected.

workforce capacity

Focuses on the ability of the workforce to perform tasks, using "capacity".

FAQs

How is "personnel strength" typically measured?

Generally, "personnel strength" refers to the total number of employees or members within an organization, often segmented by department, rank, or function. It's a quantitative measure of human resources.

What factors influence a company's "personnel strength"?

Several factors can influence "personnel strength", including budget constraints, strategic growth plans, seasonal demands, and economic conditions. Restructuring and technological advancements may also lead to changes in "personnel strength".

What are some alternatives to "personnel strength"?

You can use alternatives like "staffing level", "workforce size", or "number of employees" depending on the context.

How does "authorized strength" relate to "personnel strength"?

"Authorized strength" indicates the officially approved number of personnel, while "personnel strength" reflects the actual number of people currently employed or enlisted. Discrepancies may arise due to vacancies, budget limitations, or other factors.