Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
We therefore conducted a sensitivity analysis which was generally reassuring, while highlighting the lack of available significance levels in the "Person" intervention studies and therefore the need for caution when interpreting these results.
An 'element' was defined as 'a person, intervention, method of working or style of service organisation that makes an important contribution to improved outcome for patients when incorporated into an early intervention team'.
Similar(58)
Eighteen "Person" interventions were identified.
Why might "Price" and "Person" interventions affect inequalities differently?
"Upstream" interventions categorised as "Price" appeared to decrease inequalities, and "downstream" "Person" interventions, especially dietary counselling seemed to increase inequalities.
"Person" interventions showed more mixed results, however there remained a predominance of these interventions falling within the widen category.
Following screening, 36 studies were included: 18 "Price" interventions, 6 "Place" interventions, 1 "Product" intervention, zero "Prescriptive" interventions, 4 "Promotion" interventions, and 18 "Person" interventions.
"Person" interventions were judged as most likely to widen inequalities, with eight of the eighteen interventions having greater impact in higher SEPs [ 57, 59- 64, 64- 66, 68].
Interventions in the "Price" category appeared most likely to reduce inequalities while "Person" interventions were the most likely to widen inequalities.
"Price" interventions remained the most likely to reduce inequalities, however "Person" interventions now showed mixed results with a more even distribution of effects by SEP when being more selective by only including interventions where statistical significance values were given.
"Upstream" interventions categorised as "Price" appeared most likely to decrease health inequalities, while "downstream" "Person" interventions appeared most likely to increase inequalities (this association weakened when only studies which reported significance values pertaining to SEP differential effectiveness were included).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com