Exact(15)
Persistent speakers show state anxiety relative to fluent controls.
As the persistent speakers cease stalling, speech rate may increase that results in their fluency problem.
No studies have been done to establish whether these effects occur specifically with persistent speakers.
Work on other personality dimensions also needs to compare recovered and persistent speakers.
In particular, the change from whole to part-word dysfluencies occurs specifically for the persistent speakers (Table 3).
The increase in 4 6 on content words, specifically for persistent speakers, shows these speakers diverge from the speakers who recover.
Similar(45)
In terms of socio-environmental factors at teenage, studies have started to appear that raise the question of whether, when persistence or recovery has been established for a speaker, psychological states observed between persistent and fluent speakers remain or not when a child recovers.
This deficit may be associated with the high rate of OME (occurs for both persistent and recovered speakers) with concomitant lower rate of ventilation tubes in persistent than recovered speakers.
These figures are much lower than shown by either the persistent or recovered speakers.
Neither showed any difference, either between persistent and recovered speakers or either of these groups relative to controls.
The follow-up data on persistent and recovered speakers we have collected offers a unique resource to establish whether the states are epiphenomena of stuttering.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com