Exact(44)
Human organisms have brute-physical persistence conditions.
What grounds their difference in persistence conditions?
Some the animal people would have brute-physical persistence conditions.
Burke answers that, in general, an object has the persistence conditions associated with its dominant kind.
Another common objection is that ordinary objects have different persistence conditions from their parts.
In virtue of what do they have the persistence conditions they do?
Similar(16)
To return to an earlier example, the kind lump of clay is associated with the persistence condition of being able to survive squashing, while the kind statue is associated with the persistence condition of being unable to survive squashing.
convergence of the proposed algorithm to the consensus subspace): Consider the consensus algorithm in (6) with initial state X ¯ ( 0 ) ∈ ℝ N M. The weight coefficients satisfy the persistence condition in (9).
Theorem 1 (a.s. convergence to a finiterandom vector): Consider the consensus algorithm in (6) with initial state X ¯ ( 0 ) ∈ ℝ N M. The weight coefficients satisfy the persistence condition in (9).
Theorem 2 (convergence rate): Consider the consensus algorithm in (6) with initial state X ¯ ( 0 ) ∈ ℝ N M. The weight coefficients satisfy the persistence condition in (9) and γ ( j ) ≤ 2 λ 2 ( L ̄ ) + λ n ( L ̄ ).
From persistence condition (9), limj→∞γ(j) = 0. Then γ(j) is very close to zero and the convergence speed can be assumed negligible for j ≥ J and J large enough [26, 42].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com