The HLA-DPB1 allele matched cohort included more CML cases (43%) and fewer ALL cases (16%) than the permissive (32%-CML, 23%-ALL) and non-permissive groups (33%-CML, 23% ALL), and the groups differed slightly for GVHD prophylaxis regimens.
In the study by Arabi et al., hospital mortality was lower in the permissive underfeeding group than in the target feeding group (30.0 % vs 42.5 %; RR 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.99; P = 0.04) [66].
In the study by Arabi et al., hospital mortality was lower in the permissive underfeeding group than in the target feeding group (30.0 % vs 42.5 %; RR 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.99; P = 0.04) [ 66].
Patients were randomly assigned to permissive underfeeding group with caloric goal: 50-70 % of the calculated requirement or standard protocol feeding groups with caloric goal: 80-100 % of calculated requirement.
Instead, this was not observed in the permissive hypovolemia group in Arlati et al.'s study [ 15] or in a study by Bak [ 10].
If one were to count as permissive those groups that theoretically disapprove but actually condone such coitus, the percentage would rise to perhaps 70.
The 28-day mortality was lower in the permissive-underfeeding group (18.4 %) than in the standard-feeding group (28.9 %).
During the study period, the permissive-underfeeding group received fewer calories than did the standard-protocol feeding group (962 ± 314 kcal per day vs. 1308 ± 513 kcal per day) achieving caloric requirements of 51 ± 14%% vs. 82 ± 11 %, respectively (P < 0.001).
In the latter group, permissive and non-permissive mismatches were determined using the three-group TCE3 algorithm previously described, resulting in 585 permissively mismatched and 457 non-permissively mismatched cases (Table 1).
At the most permissive threshold for group formation (30% overlap, 30% identity), approximately 22% of transcripts belonged to 36 groups with at least one other member.
