Sentence examples for permissible interpretations from inspiring English sources

Describing the lawsuit underlying the case as "a not-so-veiled attempt to gut the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," Edwards concluded his written opinion by noting that the court's ruling "defies the will of Congress and the permissible interpretations of the agencies to whom Congress has delegated the authority to interpret and enforce the terms of the ACA".

'Ambiguity', as used by philosophers of language and linguists, refers to a different phenomenon from many closely related cases of multiple permissible interpretations.

An intriguing question then emerges as to whether disputes surrounding realism and antirealism are resolvable in principle, or whether, ultimately, internally consistent and coherent formulations of these positions should be regarded as irreconcilable but nonetheless permissible interpretations of scientific knowledge (Chakravartty 2007a, pp. 16 26).

Held: The income-first method qualifies as a permissible interpretation of the MCCA.

The Environmental Protection Agency has been sued several times over the years over the permissible interpretation of this language.

This Court's precedent dictates that we defer to the EEOC's permissible interpretation of the ADEA.

At the heart of the Communist Party Central Committee was the department of ideology, which laid down the law on everything from the permissible interpretation of history to the dissidents and artists who had to be suppressed, imprisoned, or exiled.

Since Chevron, federal agencies have enjoyed significant leeway when putting ambiguous statutes into effect.So in order to save the ACA, all the government must show is that its reading of the law is a "permissible" interpretation.

And this Court, in turn, has considered those regulatory efforts on several occasions, upholding one such effort as a permissible interpretation of the statute but striking down two others as overbroad.

See Brief for Respondent, Community Bank of Raymore at 23. Raymore contends that the Fed's clarification of the meaning of "applicant" was not a permissible interpretation, because it was not consistent with the plain meaning of the statute or Congress's intention.

Thus, even were I to conclude that one might read the exclusion of an "appointee on the policymaking level" to include state judges, our precedent would compel me to accept the EEOC's contrary reading of the exclusion if it were a "permissible" interpretation of this ambiguous term.