Sentence examples for permissible evidence from inspiring English sources

While conceding that the bead ages were not specific enough to support claims of a relationship to terrestrial life, the scientists said "the correlation is permissible evidence of a causal relation".

Lawyers for Rights of Women had told the court large numbers of victims are being turned away "at the first hurdle" because they have no permissible evidence, and had been left with the choice of paying a solicitor privately – often resulting in them going into debt – representing themselves, or doing nothing and continuing to be at risk.

Consequently, information gained from sobriety tests, police lineups, voice samples, and the like is constitutionally permissible while evidence gained from compelled testimony is not.

In addition to the rave-related laws that were passed into being, the CJPOA also gave police additional powers for stop and search procedures, repealed councils from having to offer travellers sites for domestic use, and meant that silence in interviews or as a response to legal questioning was now permissible as evidence of supposed inference.

Reformed epistemology might be thought of as a modification of evidentialism in which the permissible kinds of evidence are expanded.

The rules on what sort of evidence is permissible, as laid down by the 1973 act, are at variance with international norms, and with Bangladeshi jurisprudence.

"There was no valid line of reasoning or permissible inferences from the evidence that could lead a rational person to conclude that Rios knew of the conditions in the apartment," she wrote.

In "The Will to Believe" he lays out a series of strict conditions under which an "option" counts as "genuine" and believing without sufficient evidence is permissible or required.

The Supreme Court has not considered the issue since a 1956 case in which it suggested that the use of secret evidence might be permissible under the Constitution for national security reasons.

Thus, even when two people share the same evidence, it is permissible for one to adopt one doxastic attitude toward a proposition and for the other to adopt a different attitude (also see Pettit 2006).

This is legally permissible, so long as no evidence is destroyed.