Sentence examples for period between groups from inspiring English sources

The distributions of incubation period between groups were compared after fitting the data with Cox regression models.

Comparison of mean incubation period between groups of inocula was performed by using two-tailed t-tests, where significance was accepted at P < 0.01 or P< 0.05.

No statistically significant differences at 5% significance level were found in health outcomes or changes in activities of daily living during a 12-month follow-up period between groups admitted for acute reasons to a community hospital and to a general hospital.

The median duration of follow-up was over 6 months in both groups, however, with no statistically significant difference in median follow-up period between groups and only one long-term complication noted in the study (a delayed trachea-innominate fistula).

Kaplan-Meier survival plots showed no significant differences during the observation period between group A and group B (Figure 2) (hazard ratio: 0.61; confidence interval 95%: 0.34 to 1.04; log-rank test: P = 0.0699).

Shown is a comparison of blood gas analysis and haemodynamic parameters at the end of the 6-hour observational period between group 1 (responders) and group 2 (nonresponders).

The log-rank test was used to compare survival time periods between groups.

A Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare differences of hourly data points through the light and dark periods between groups in sleep analysis.

We found no evidence of any differences between estimates of scores at each time period or between-group differences scored on either method and conclude that the weighting did not bias our results.

After the follow-up period the between-group-differences more or less remained the same, though the magnitude of the differences diminished.

After adjustment for period effect, between-group differences in the incidence of severe AMS, headache, severe headache, SpO2 level and pulse rate at checkpoint 4, and ∆SpO2 level were not significant (all P > 0.05) (Table  3).