"performs poor" is correct and usable in written English.
It is usually used in the context of someone or something not performing as well as expected. For example, "The student performed poorly on the test."
Consequently, more cycles are needed for searching best solution, and the algorithm performs poor efficiency relatively.
LML models are specifically designed for big textual data and therefore performs poor with single domain.
The control system performs poor in characteristics and even it becomes unstable, if improper values of the controller tuning constants are used.
Again, the same trend can be seen as LS-based channel estimation algorithm performs poor with respect to the CS-based channel estimation algorithms.
Low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (LEACH) [11] is designed for homogenous WSNs; however, this algorithm performs poor in heterogeneous networks because the low-energy nodes die more quickly than the high-energy ones due to the fact that the clustering algorithm does not have in built discrimination in terms of energy levels.
MI-GRAAL performs poor in other biological measures, too.
Thus, they generally perform poor performance on the imbalanced datasets.
Due to its explicit visualization of branches, Cabinet Tree performs poorer than Squarified Treemap in scalability.
As a common behavior in these settings, adaptive transmission policy performs poorer than the proposed scheme.
And in the meantime, how can it justify usage of a system that hasn't been adequately tested, and in fact performs poorest on the targets it is most frequently loosed upon?
Additionally, we see that the SO-DCTS algorithm performs poorest in a path network where it has the largest value of and the slowest convergence speed.
