Sentence examples for performance reliably from inspiring English sources

However, in both of these time windows, nonparametric ANOVAs yielded significant main effects for subject performance (factors: condition ("noise alone" vs. "tone plus noise") and subject performance (reliably perceive as continuous vs. discontinuous); P50: H = 25.8, df = 51, p = 0.044; N270 350: H = 31.9, df = 51, p = 0.019; both corrected for multiple comparisons).

For Model A, the equation was as follows: 5 To evaluate model performance reliably, different data sets should be used when designing and validating the model.

However, after 3.5 s, the resonance of motor program wave1 is stronger than that of circle1, and from about second 4.0 on Vince recognizes the wave1 performance reliably.

Patient panels of individual physicians and small groups are typically too small to measure performance reliably [ 2, 54, 56, 63, 76, 90].

In that case, replacing and/or updating measures are warranted, also because variation in performance may have become too small to measure performance reliably and to discriminate across providers [ 63, 90].

Noticeably, the results found here are in line with findings reported in the literature for other speech-in-noise tests (sentence, word, or nonsense syllable tests) that are typically used for hearing assessment in the clinic [ 50, 56– 59], overall confirming that the SUN test can estimate speech recognition performance reliably and quickly in adults and older adults.

Moreover, common experience has shown that conventional tests, even though they may predict academic performance, cannot reliably predict the way in which intelligence will be applied (i.e., through performance in jobs or other life situations beyond school).

For every variable, the intercept (initial performance) differed reliably from zero.

To date, most research on CTC has focused on its technical performance to reliably detect and exclude the presence of adenomatous polyps in the colon.

As expected, performance was reliably reduced on trials with invalid cues [63% correct vs. 77% with valid cues, t(10) = 7.4, P < 0.001], as apparent in all subjects.

The present results demonstrate that in the most commonly used version of the OIC task (e.g., [4,6 12,31]), in which animals receive only one sample trial with each of the two objects, performance was reliably better when the animals were tested in the most recent context.