Similar(60)
The performance of these models in predicting flow over these features is investigated.
The performance of these models is evaluated through comparisons of predicted and measured Vs values.
Deviance information criterion (DIC) was used to measure the performance of these models.
Results showed a better performance of these models when compared with standard factorial designs.
An attempt has been made to understand the relative performance of these models.
The performance of these models was compared both visually and analytically.
The performance of these models is evaluated using experimental data, and the merits and limitations of these models are provided.
The performance of these models is compared with that of the discrete element model with global uniform contact parameters.
Mostly common statistical errors are utilized to evaluate the performance of these models and identify the most accurate model.
An experimental study on the form design of mobile phones is conducted to evaluate the performance of these models.
Two different experimental setups were designed to validate and study the performance of these models under different conditions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com