The 7 May performance of The Vote at the Donmar Warehouse in London will be broadcast live on the More4 channel.
From Tables 5 and 6, we can see that, using the CLD feature only, the best performance in voting is attained when the top 3 algorithms (SimpleCart, REPTree, and FT) are selected using the CLD feature only, but the performance of voting with the majority is approximately equal to that of the individual algorithm.
I assess and compare the performance of three voting mechanisms, Approval Voting, Borda Count, and Plurality Voting under two information structures.
In this paper, experiments were conducted to measure the performance of voting prediction, i.e., the accuracy of predicting the vote intention of the users, by applying an HMM classifier to VAA data (filled in questionnaires).
They act as a check on the government, theorized as a yardstick in the hands of the people to measure the performance of the government and vote it out of power if it does not fulfill the promises made during the elections.
We also noted that the best performance of voting with the majority system (top 23) delivered lower FP events, that is, 186, than those of the top three individual algorithms, which are 303, 297, and 307, respectively.
Experiments were designed to investigate the performance of social voting recommendation by using HMMs for similarity matching between parties and users in VAAs.
Next, the polling missed the over-performance of the Leave vote.
Finally, the polling missed the under-performance of the Remain vote, which seemed not much more inspired by the major parties' establishmentarian leaders than Leave voters were dissuaded by same.
