Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
In the current study, we decided to re-examine the performance of the criterion of alternating buttock pain, because of the high cost associated with MRI-SI: we were searching for a criterion that could help us in deciding which patients should undergo MRI-SI.
That is, a GPA of 1.5 at Institution A is likely to reflect a different standard of student achievement than a GPA of 1.5 at Institution B. In addition, while all medical courses are accredited and regularly audited, the quality and performance of the criterion variables are unknown.
Similar(58)
Table 5 displays the performance of the criteria.
We evaluated the performance of the criteria used in ongoing studies on less radical surgery.
The number of cases that met the inclusion criteria and the performance of the criteria from each study are shown in Table 4.
Considering that few studies have validated the characteristics of low-risk criteria used in ongoing studies, our study has value as it evaluated the performance of the criteria used in three ongoing studies and compared them simultaneously in one institution.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the criteria used in ongoing studies retrospectively and suggest a new, simplified criterion in microscopic Stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Adding both ANA ≥1 640 and B-cell ratio ≥5 did not significantly modify the diagnostic performance of the criteria set (Se 84.2% vs. 83.1% and Sp 96.1% vs. 97.1%).
Adding either of these two criteria to the AECG criteria set increased sensitivity from 83.1% to 90.9% but decreased specificity from 97.1% to 85.6%, whereas adding both criteria in combination did not substantially modify the diagnostic performance of the criteria set.
In the present study, we show that the histopathological evaluation of salivary gland biopsies with multilevel sectioning and assessment of a cumulative focus score (cFS) changes the baseline classification in 6% of patients evaluated for SS and increases the diagnostic performance of the criteria recently proposed by the AECG for SS classification [ 5].
In the next experiment, we used the method of Gordon [1] to assess the comparison performance of this criterion (12).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com