Sentence examples for performance of susceptibility from inspiring English sources

The performance of susceptibility testing has not yet reached the relatively high level seen for identification.

An overall category error rate of < 10% was considered for an acceptable performance of susceptibility tests, including ≤1.5% of very major errors and ≤3.0% major errors [ 13].

It has been reported that an overall error rate of <10%% should be obtainable for an accepted performance of susceptibility testing [ 18– 20].

The prediction performance of the susceptibility map is checked by considering actual landslides in the study area.

The unimodal susceptibility pattern is indicative of excellent and near complete activity against key Gram-positive pathogens including multiply resistant strains, but surveillance for emerging resistances (rare) and the performance of routine susceptibility tests to guide patient therapy seems prudent.

Soil magnetic properties were significantly (0.79**) correlated to the andic properties, so confirming the high performance of magnetic susceptibility as low cost proxy for the identification of volcanic constituents.

Performance of drug susceptibility testing (DST) using conventional methods relies on solid or liquid media and is slow and resource intensive.

The identification of clinically significant bacteria in the laboratory and the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) provides information essential for an accurate management of patients with a bacterial infection [ 1].

Performance of drug susceptibility testing (DST) to measure drug resistance is important not only before treatment, but also in the course of therapy to identify acquired resistance, especially in the areas with a high incidence of MDR-TB [ 1].

The recent introduction of antifungal drugs with different mechanisms of action such as the echinocandins (e.g. caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin) and second-generation triazoles, together with the improved performance of antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) methods justifies the greater use of AFST in clinical practice.

We further recognize that there may have been some variation in the performances of the susceptibility tests performed across the different sites, by different scientists, and using different reagent manufacturers, although all sites adhere to CLSI guidelines.