Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Systematic training of review teams, standardisation of review processes and feedback on results should improve the performance of review teams.
Similar(59)
To describe experiences with the implementation of global trigger tool (GTT) reviews in five Danish hospitals and to suggest ways to improve the performance of GTT review teams.
We rigorously characterize the performance of deploying review strategies and determine the optimal design (optimal billing cycle, punishment phase length, etc).
To suggest ways to improve the performance of GTT review teams.
We evaluate the performance of the reviewed steganographic techniques.
These measures have been used to report the performance of the reviewed methods in the tables.
To evaluate the performance of the reviewed techniques, the imperceptibility and the detectability rate of hidden data are assessed.
The last experiment shows the performance of the reviewed methods in the reconstruction of the cameraman image of size 256×256 from a set contaminated measurements.
Several examples are presented to illustrate and compare the performance of the reviewed measures.
The inter-rater reliability of the assessment of trainee performance by review of video was 89.3% (Range 83.7-93.9%) for checklist scores and 27.8% (Range 0 66.7%) for GRS scores.
MS was involved in the design and performance of the systematic review and analysis, and in drafting, revision, review and approval of the manuscript.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com