Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(11)
The performance of consensus clustering is more robust, novel, stable, consistent, and out-perform Wards' method in case of using ALOGP fingerprint.
The focus of this work examines how cycles impact the H2 performance of consensus networks.
The performance of consensus clustering outperforms the Wards' method.
The performance of consensus clustering gives robust results which are better than overall performance of individual clusterings.
Reports of improved performance of consensus models [4 6] or its lack thereof [7] have been published.
Thus, the degree of orthogonality between PLS and KNN would be one of the factors with an impact on the performance of consensus PLS-KNN models.
Similar(49)
Table 3 indicates the performances of consensus models and individual sub-models calculated for the different number of excluded outlying molecules as described in the Methods section.
A comparison of the performance improvement of consensus models indicates that generally the models of type iii perform best.
35 Their result indicated a performance order of Consensus method > SVRMHC (SVR) > MHC2PRED (SVM) > MHCPRED (QSAR regression).
The performance of CVAA consensus clustering significantly outperforms Ward and graph-based consensus clustering methods (CSPA and HGPA) using F and QPI measures for both ALOGP and ECFP_4 fingerprints, while the graph-based consensus methods outperform the Ward's method only for ALOGP using QPI measure.
To assess the performance of the consensus module detection method, we performed a simulation study involving two simulated gene expression data sets.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com