Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
To evaluate differences in performance between the two sessions, two parallel monitors were used.
Similar(59)
The order of sessions was randomized and the interval between the two sessions was over 2 weeks.
No significant differences were observed between the two sessions for any statistic index.
A minimum of 5 minutes elapsed between the two sessions.
We performed comparisons of 1 V/m versus sham and 10 V/m versus sham for session 1, session 2, and the difference between the two sessions.
However, the RMSES clearly varied between the three sessions: the performance of intra- and extrapolation within session I was similar to the performance in the training set (on average 0.07±0.03°), but increased to 0.14±0.02° in session II and increased even more in session III (0.37±0.20°).
Thus, all three nocturnal sessions had the same homeostatic and chronobiological pressure and therefore differences of performance between the three driving sessions can only be explained by the increase of fatigue generated by a longer driving session.
Performances were presented in counterbalanced order across the two sessions.
Group A (n = 41) completed the computer-delivered tasks during Session 1 and the face-to-face tasks during Session 2; Group B (n = 38) completed the face-to-face tasks during Session 1 and the computer-delivered tasks during Session 2. The two sessions had an interval of seven to ten days between them.
The two sessions were counterbalanced.
What's the biggest difference between how you approach the performance between the two mediums?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com