Sentence examples for perfectly equivalent to from inspiring English sources

I'm familiar with the concept of leap years, of course, but Forster was saying that no one month, year, minute, hour is exactly, perfectly equivalent to any other.

Furthermore, the design of two-level capillary stop valves and vapor-diffusion chambers in this device allows vapor transport between the protein droplet and the stored precipitant, perfectly equivalent to that observed in conventional vapor diffusion techniques, which slowly brings the protein droplet into a supersaturation state to nucleate and grow protein crystals.

In fact, the back translation from the American native back translator was almost perfectly equivalent to the original items that did not require cross-cultural adaptation.

Averages are here intended at steady state, thus the repression level measure 〈 p〉/〈 p0〉 for the stochastic model is perfectly equivalent to the one used in the response time analysis (see Figure 2).

The lines are very broad because the large number of iron sites that contribute to them are not perfectly equivalent (ΓL = 0.44 mm/s in a preliminary fit using Lorentzian line shapes).

In future work on virus evolution, we would do good to focus on the important questions, such as whether we can develop accurate, quantitative models of virus evolution, and to leave aside discussions about the relative merits of perfectly equivalent concepts.

A perfectly equivalent behavior is found for active powers (but this is not shown in figure).

Hence, if unlimited transmission to future generations is considered an important aspect, external and internal citizenships of Mexico are still not perfectly equivalent.

A CEOV of 1 implies that the examiners were perfectly equivalent in their readings.

This suggests that the total inter-examiner variability between left and right readings is approximately 1.56 times higher than one would expect if the two examiners were perfectly equivalent in their readings of the left and right paraspinal temperatures.

The COEV for the total inter-examiner variability between trial 1 and trial 2 readings is 1.32, suggesting that the observed variability is approximately 1.32 times higher than one would expect if the two examiners were perfectly equivalent in their readings (See Table 4).