Average percentage relative error.
RSD%, percentage relative standard deviation; R.M.E %, percentage relative mean error.
The percentage relative increase ranged from 36 to 356%.
Precision was expressed as percentage relative standard deviation (RS D < 2).
Also, small values of the percentage relative standard deviation (RSD %) and the percentage relative errors (% Er) indicate high accuracy and high precision of the proposed method, Table 2.
The results are reported as percentage relative error (RE %) and percentage relative standard deviation (RS D%) which indicates the accuracy and precision of methods, respectively.
Virus infection is expressed as a percentage relative to that in sh-NC-containing cells.
Estimated bulk and element mass changes are indicated as percentage relative to the protolith abundance.
Percentage relative standard deviation (% R.S.D). between recovered and certified values was < 5.8.
The percentage relative error was calculated according the following equation: Er % = [(found – added)/added] × 100.
The size of small RNAs was plotted versus frequency (percentage relative to total abundance).
