Sentence examples for percentage recognition from inspiring English sources

Figure 5 Percentage recognition rate of different features on TI-20 database in white noise environment.

Figure 3 Percentage recognition rate for different LPC orders using (a) LPCC features, (b) WLPC (UWLPC/DWLPC) features.

Percentage recognition rate using LPCC and WLPC (UWLPC/DWLPC) features for different LPC order were also estimated and presented in Figure 3.

The performances of LPCC, MFCC, and WLPC (UWLPC/DWLPC) features have been tested on TI-20 database and presented in Table 3. Table 3 Percentage recognition rates of different features on TI-20 database.

Table 2 Percentage recognition rate of LPCC and MFCC features on various datasets Dataset % Recognition rate   LPCC MFCC TI-20 97.2 98.2 TI-ALPHA 80.6 85.8 Marathi Digits 78.9 84.5.

Fig. 4 shows percentage recognition of the shapes to be over 70% when the dot pairs are displayed as rapidly as possible, i.e., with 0 ms of separation between offset of the last member of one pair and the onset of the first member of the next pair.

Furthermore, the percentage of recognition of menopausal symptoms, especially of vasomotor symptoms, is lower than that of Western women and higher than that of women in Hong Kong and Southern China.

The results also confirm that consecutive error rate, or the percentage of recognition errors immediately adjacent to another error, has a negative impact on the effectiveness of third-party error detection.

This also justifies the SNR values used in producing the results in Tables 2 8 and the corresponding high percentage of recognition observed since these SNRs represent the for each case.

One possible reason for the low percentage of recognition of ⑮ (the ability to understand the intended meaning that is not explicitly stated) is that the participants did not actually answer the questions but only indicated their perceptions by skimming the item and using their first impression.

The percentage of recognition dropped with the frequency of the variants in the circulating population: to 41% for 'variant 1' peptides and to 26% for 'variant 4' peptides.