Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
Percentage of trainees' consultations involving a chronic disease was calculated, with 95% confidence intervals.
Pre and post training score analysis on type and error rates has shown that majority of trainees committed quantification error but the percentage of trainees with this type of error substantially decrease after they were trained (p = 0.02).
Before the training 12.4% of trainees were found to commit minor error of low false negative but after training, the percentage of trainees with this error were found to decrease (p < 0.0001) (Table 4).
Although, not all trainees met the operative target for any one procedure, the percentage of trainees achieving target operative levels was higher in the elective compared with the emergency procedures.
The ITP also specifies an arbitrary target number of emergency and elective operative procedures that a trainee should aim to assist and perform during a 6-month training post and Table 2 shows the percentage of trainees that achieved these targets over the complete 2-year training programme.
The percentage of trainees rating other topics as useful were as follows: clinical skills related to smoking cessation (30%), the trans-theoretical model (11%), the risks of smoking and the benefits of quitting (7%), the case discussion (5%), the strategy of tobacco control (5%) and nicotine addiction and withdrawal (4%).
Similar(53)
The intervention was also effective in increasing percentage of trainee's correct responses.
§Refers to percentage of trainee doctors in the entire sample.
The motivating and challenging factors described by the PhD trainees are reported as percentages of trainees mentioning the given factors.
The percentages of trainees practicing 5As guideline were higher than those in studies from the US [ 11- 14], China [ 15], and Hong Kong [ 16].
Trainee involvement was graded by approximate percentage of time trainees handled the duodenoscope (0%, 1%-50%, 51%-99%, 100%), including cannulation and therapy, in any particular case.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com