Figure 9 Phone accuracies (percent) versus the percentage of template representatives for MDTS (LLR) and MLTS (KL).
From Figure 9, we conclude that MLTS is more robust to using a small percentage of template representatives, and the selection percentage of 20% is a reasonable compromise between accuracy performance and computation and storage cost.
The frequency of BIR increased in the mph1 Δ mutant, but the percentage of template switch events was significantly decreased, revealing an important role for Mph1 in promoting BIR-associated template switching.
In Figure 9, we show how the percentages of template representatives selected from the total templates affect phone accuracies for MDTS and MLTS with their respectively compatible distances.
On the TIMIT task, we provide a detailed account of the factors in the proposed template matching methods that affect the rescoring performance, including local distances, number of GMMs employed for frame labeling, template selection, compression methods and their interactions with the local distances, and the percentage of selected template representatives.
However it should be remembered that this technique although very sensitive, in terms of the percentage of mutated template detected, does not allow to detect all kinds of mutations [ 17- 20].
This fraction, expressed as a percentage, represented the percentage of functional templates, or QFI.
Importantly, the results of QFI-PCR can be used to calculate the minimum amount of sample input for targeted PCR enrichment by measuring the percentage of DNA templates that are competent for PCR amplification.
The areas on the pain drawings were measured in square millimeters and calculated as percentage of the total body template area using a commercial software program (Quantify One; K L O N K, Sorø, Denmark), a method that has been shown to be reliable for quantifying pain drawings [ 51, 52].
The second approach to measuring naturalness is to factor in the percentage of agreement with the naturalness template.
Therefore, we tested if eliminating the Mlh1 protein, an essential component of the mismatch repair system, which plays no role in processing branched DNA intermediates (Harfe and Jinks-Robertson 2000), would change either the percentage of Ade+ transformants or the template switching/BIR-associated chromosomal recombination ratio.
