Sentence examples for percentage of isolation from inspiring English sources

Results are shown in Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 Percentage of isolation attempts from bark cores yielding cultures of Phytophthora kernoviae at intervals after treatment of pine segments with Phytophthora kernoviae oospores and incubation at five temperatures (Study 1).

Figure 2 Percentage of isolation attempts yielding cultures of Phytophthora kernoviae after application of oospores to the bark surface for heat treated and untreated oospore suspensions in Study 1 (back transformed means with standard errors).

The results were expressed as isolation frequency (percentage of samples in which each genus was present) and relative density (percentage of isolation of each species among the same genus).

The highest percentage of isolation was from the ICU (22 %), followed by paediatrics (21 %), neurosurgery (16 %) and general surgery ward (13 %) [ 16].

The high percentage of isolation of tissue cysts from seropositive chickens (59%, 24/41) is as expected since poultry production using extensive management of FR chickens is associated with T. gondii infection from the soil [ 2].

In our study, E. coli was the most common pathogen (72%), 10% over the national percentage given by SMART, followed by Klebsiella (20%) and Enterobacter (7.3%) with percentages of isolation very similar to the national study.

‡The percentage of isolates is given for the source of isolation subset.

HSV was isolated from 164 (2.6%) ILI patients and the highest percentage of HSV isolation was observed in the coastal cities of Lima, Tumbes, and Piura (Table 2).

The percentage of parasite isolation in our study was 78.5% in acute and 50.7% in chronic cases.

The peak percentage of patients in isolation ranged from 6.2% to 9.1% and 2.9% to 5.0% for high and medium prevalence, respectively, and was higher for universal screening than for selective screening (table 3).

Percentage isolation of Phytophthora kernoviae was significantly less when oospores were heated before application (Treatment D, 4.4%) than when they were not (Treatment A, 10.1%; averaged across 15°C and 20°C and all time intervals; F1,5 = 8.31, p = 0.035; Figures 1 and 2B).