Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
b Percentage graph of live/dead cell ratio dependent on the titration of C PFA. Data is presented as the mean ± standard deviation, with t test results indicating p < 0.05.
The percentage graph was generated by first calculating the mean of the counts of each phenotype (dumpy, Wild-type hermaphrodite, Wild-type male) generated each day.
Similar(58)
Linear annotated maps of the maxicircle sequence and TA skew, GC skew and GC percentage graphs of the coding region were created using Artemis [ 68].
Tables of percentages, graphs and chi-square were used for data presentation.
Equally beware figures, statistics, percentages, graphs, charts and the like.
This is presented as a percentage frequency graph, cumulative frequency graph and a box and whisker plot showing median value, with interquartile ranges, with maximum and minimum points as the ends of the whiskers.
Figure 15 shows the percentage exceedance graph, with the 50%% line highlighted, and Fig. 16 shows profilometric measure of 1 m in the wavelength range of 30 100 mm.
Open image in new window Fig. 14 Acoustic roughness spectrum compared with standard limits curves Open image in new window Fig. 15 Percentage exceedance graph Open image in new window Fig. 16 Profile recorded in via Gianicolense (a) and its selection of one-meter long (bottom) (b) in the wavelength range of λ = 30 100 mm (thresholds ±300 μm).
The mean ± standard deviation of the mean (SDM) relative to the percentage (normalized graphs) of cell growth inhibition and parasite growth inhibition were used to estimate the IC50 using non-linear regression with the software GraphPad Prism, version 5.0.
MIC values of aqueous P60, caffeine, and their MEs were estimated from percentage inhibition graphs and are shown in Table 3. Combination of P60 and caffeine further lowered the MICs of individual agents in both aqueous form and ME formulation.
The descriptive statistical techniques applied in the study include percentages and graphs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com