We found no significant difference between groups with respect to the percentage of feature and place choices (Mann–Whitney U tests: feature: N = 11, U = 9.500, P = 0.340; place: N = 11, U = 9.500, P = 0.340).
The last column of Table 1 reports the percentage of feature missing values, i.e., for each feature F k, the last column in Table 1 lists the proportion of genes g i 's such that F k i = Ø.
For method 4 we used the percentage of features in the test feature group with targets fully met.
The last column reports the percentage of feature missing values.
SSDs amongst the three grade classes at the 1% statistical level were also revealed by the Run Percentage textural feature.
We first examined the percentage of feature peaks within DNase hypersensitive sites (DHSs) in human embryonic stem cell (H1hesc) line.
Figure 2 depicts the mean percentage of feature, place and control searches in the test session for all four ape species.
When we compared the percentage of feature and place choices in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we found evidence that the percentage of place choices increased significantly from Experiment 1 to Experiment 2. These results demonstrate that the different tasks in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 had some influence on which strategies were preferentially used by the apes.
When we compared the percentage of feature and place choices in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2, we found that subjects made significantly more place choices in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1 (Wilcoxon tests: feature: Z = 1.424, P = 0.164; place: Z = 2.521, P = 0.009).
Secondly, spots were filtered using cut off values for average signal to noise ratio (SNR 635, 532), spot intensity (Mean F635, F532) for both red and green channel, and for the percentage of feature pixels with intensities more than two standard deviations above the background intensity (at wavelength 635 or 532 (% > B635+2SD)).
