Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(60)
My method looks at the absolute value of percentage errors.
Their percentage errors are in the range 0.24 4.55%.
Measures were used to validate the adequacy of these models including, the mean average percentage errors and the maximum percentage errors.
The resulting percentage errors in Q estimation are summarized in Table 1.
Table 8 Percentage errors for diathermic oil Equation (7) Equation (8) 4 (oil) 51.21 51.21.
The percentage errors between the actual ranges and ranges with offset are recorded.
For single acquisition, the percentage errors were improved by the scatter correction with TEWDR.
Experimental results are in concordance with the developed model, and the average percentage errors are in the order of 2%.
For about 90% of time in the year, the illuminance percentage errors were less than 10%, and the percentage errors in calculating the optimum slat angles were less than 5%.
The minimum mean absolute percentage errors of 11.99% and 12.75% for SSeff and CODeff could be achieved using ANFIS.
Results show that the proposed method improves the mean percentage errors by at least 5.7% on average hourly load profile.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com