Suggestions(5)
Exact(28)
The maximum percentage error between these two solutions is only 0.001%.
In each case, the percentage error between the two sets of experiment was within ±10%%.
The percentage error between the output and actual ranges is then compared.
The percentage error between the Weibull wind speed frequencies and the observed frequencies is almost identical for various wind speeds.
Finally, the construction parameters of the mechanism are determined and the variation of the percentage error between the desired and generated function values is obtained.
The three architectures produced a mean absolute percentage error between 4 and 6%, but the feedforward architecture behaved better considering validation and test sets, with 4,2% error.
Similar(32)
The percentage errors between the actual ranges and ranges with offset are recorded.
The percentage errors between the scatter-corrected count and the primary count for the planar images were evaluated.
Table 3 shows the absolute percentage errors between the scatter corrected and the primary counts for the simulated planar images.
The introduction of imperfections reduced the percentage errors between computations and tests within 5% in so far as buckling and collapse loads are concerned.
To address this issue, the relative percentage errors between the corresponding constants obtained using the practical data and the calculated model based constant are computed only using the second IMF to the sixth IMF.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com