Suggestions(1)
Exact(10)
During the first week of acquisition, no preference was noted for the active versus the inactive lever (percentage choice on the active lever was 49.6±9.3%, as expected by chance) (Fig. 1B).
The dependent measure was the percentage choice of the beer (R3) vs. chocolate response (R4).
Figure 4 shows percentage choice of large reward as the delay to the large reward increased.
The dependent measure was the percentage choice of the beer (R1) versus the chocolate (R2) response.
The primary outcome was percentage choice of the tobacco- over the chocolate-seeking response in plain pack, branded pack and no-stimulus conditions.
Table 1 and Fig. 2a show the percentage choice of the tobacco- versus the chocolate-seeking response in the three stimulus conditions of the PIT test.
Similar(50)
The percentage of choice errors to go-signals was low and did not discriminate between recreational users (1.9%) and cocaine-free users (1.0%).
This training resulted in a stable percentage of choice for the right lever (large reinforcement) of 89%, a score similar to those previously reported in the literature in control rats [ 43, 56, 57].
The FD was adjusted each session according to the following titration protocol (%VD indicating the percentage of choices made to the VD stimulus in the choice trials).
Table 2 A comparison of the mean percentage of choices made by novices and advanced students (standard deviations reported in brackets) Novice Advanced U (sig).
For each combination, we plotted the percentage of choices towards the higher reward vs the mean response time for trials in the specified condition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com